Amitabh Bachchan, pan masala, and the noise round surrogate adverts in India



Amitabh Bachchan lately pulled out of an endorsement take care of a well-liked pan masala model on his 79th birthday after dealing with a backlash on social media. The Bollywood megastar, who featured within the advert for this model’s ‘silver-coated cardamom seeds’ with actor Ranveer Singh, claimed that he was not conscious when the advert was being filmed that it fell underneath surrogate promoting. He additionally returned the cash he had acquired for the endorsement.


This was not the primary time an actor had landed in such an argument. In 2016, former James Bond actor Pierce Brosnan had appeared in a surrogate commercial for one more pan masala producer. He had claimed that the corporate cheated him by not disclosing the dangerous nature of its product. The corporate, then again, burdened that the product Brosnan endorsed was a mouth freshener and shouldn’t be related to chewing tobacco.





A number of actors, together with Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn, Mahesh Babu, Salman Khan, Anushka Sharma, Priyanka Chopra, Tiger Shroff and Hrithik Roshan, have additionally made appearances within the adverts of mouth fresheners made by pan masala manufacturers.


India’s pan masala market dimension*


2020: Rs 45,585 crore


2026: Rs 69,518 crore


*Projections by IMARC Group


Based on market analysis agency IMARC Group, the scale of the pan masala market in India, which was Rs 45,585 crore in 2020, is projected to achieve Rs 69,518 by 2026.


Amitabh Bachhan’s pullout has reignited a debate on the legality of such adverts. Firms use surrogate promoting as a workaround to advertise tobacco and alcohol merchandise, whose promoting is banned by regulation within the nation.


However how are celebrities in a position to promote such manufacturers? It’s completed via what is known as surrogate promoting.


Surrogate promoting first surfaced in India after the Cable Tv Networks (Regulation) Act 1995 banned direct commercials of liquor, cigarettes and tobacco merchandise.


Such adverts promote the established model names of firms whose predominant merchandise fall underneath the class whose promoting just isn’t allowed. That is completed by utilizing the identical model names for various merchandise altogether. The aim of surrogate adverts is to extend model recall within the minds of customers. New merchandise carrying the identical model title are often known as model extensions, which isn’t unlawful underneath the Act. The principles enable some liberty for such surrogate commercials underneath the pretext of brand name extensions. Notable examples embody the adverts for soda and music CDs by liquor firms. That is completed utilizing trademark diversification.


The Cigarettes and Different Tobacco Merchandise Act (COTPA) 2003 prohibits direct and oblique promoting of tobacco merchandise. This Act additionally doesn’t enable adverts of different items utilizing the model title of tobacco merchandise.


However plain pan masala that doesn’t include tobacco may be marketed on tv, though its packaging accommodates a compulsory well being warning, because it has substances like betel nut, a identified carcinogen that’s addictive.


However celebrities are restricted from promoting plain pan masala due to specific Promoting and Requirements Council of India tips, which say that merchandise bearing well being warnings by regulation can’t be endorsed by them. Nonetheless, adverts for cardamom seeds, equivalent to these completed by Amitabh Bachhan and Hrithin Roshan, are seen as surrogate for tobacco merchandise or pan masala bearing the identical model title.


Established in 1985, the ASCI is a voluntary self-regulatory organisation with members from advertising and marketing, media, and allied firms.


It has laid out the standards for what constitutes a real model extension and never a surrogate commercial for tobacco and liquor merchandise.


In January this yr, it banned surrogate adverts of 12 liquor firms after they didn’t persuade these had been real extensions.


In Might this yr, ASCI issued strict tips to crack down on surrogate adverts. The principles state that the product bought underneath the model extension that has been current out there for lower than two years will need to have a turnover of Rs 20 lakh monthly or display fastened asset funding of a minimum of Rs 10 crore.


If the model has been current for greater than two years, its annual turnover needs to be Rs 5 crore nationally or Rs 1 crore per state the place distribution has been established. The numbers have to be validated by an unbiased company or a CA agency.


The Ministry of Info and Broadcasting final yr suggested that surrogate commercials be previewed and authorized by the Central Board of Movie Certification (CBFC) earlier than they’re allowed for public viewing on tv. The regulation prohibits surrogate commercials whereas permitting adverts of real model extensions, topic to sure circumstances.


Whereas celebrities in some uncommon instances could cease doing surrogate adverts on account of public uproar, the federal government can re-examine the regulation on this space, as such adverts defeat the very objective of the promoting ban on tobacco and liquor. Regardless of a number of layers of prohibition, surrogate adverts are solely thriving, as evidenced by their presence in mega occasions just like the Indian Premier League.


https://www.business-standard.com/podcast/economy-policy/amitabh-bachchan-pan-masala-and-the-noise-around-surrogate-ads-in-india-121102100663_1.html

Leave a Reply